nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2015, 01, v.6 25-27
治疗性游戏联合心理干预在儿童多发性抽动症中的应用分析
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2015.01.008
发布时间: 2015-01-20
出版时间: 2015-01-20
移动端阅读
摘要:

目的探讨分析治疗性游戏联合心理干预在儿童多发性抽动症中的应用效果。方法将80例多发性抽动症患儿随机分为对照组和观察组,每组40例,其中对照组采用维思通治疗与常规护理,观察组在对照组的基础上应用治疗性游戏联合心理干预。采用耶鲁抽动症严重程度评分量表(YGTSS)进行综合抽动严重程度的量化评分,对治疗性游戏联合心理干预治疗儿童多发性抽动症的疗效进行评价。结果两组儿童治疗后的抽动总分较治疗前明显降低,观察组治疗后的抽动总分较对照组下降更显著,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,对照组和观察组总有效率分别为52.5%、95.0%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用治疗性游戏联合心理干预治疗儿童多发性抽动症,疗效显著,值得推广。

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of herapeutic game combined with psychological intervention in the treatment of Tourette syndrome( TS) of children. Methods 80 TS cases were separated into control group( n = 40) and observation group( n = 40)randomly. The control group was given both of Risperidone tablets and conventional treatment. Observation group received combined therapies of both herapeutic game and psychological intervention. The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale( YGTSS) was used to record the changes of the attachment before and after the treatment,so as to evaluate the curative effect of the combination of herapeutic game and psychological intervention. Results YGTSS total scores of both groups after treatment were statistically lower than those of before treatment. YGTSS total score difference was statistically significant between two groups at the end of the treatment( P < 0. 05). The efficiency Percentages of control and observation group were 52. 5% and 95. 0% respectively. The efficiency Percentage difference was statistically significant between two groups( P < 0. 05). Conclusion A combined therapy of both herapeutic game and psychological intervention would be more effective for the treatment of childhood Tourette syndrome,it can be promoted.

参考文献

[1]申荷永,陈侃,高岚.沙盘游戏治疗的历史与理论[J].心理发展与教育,2005,21(2):124-128.

[2]张利滨,章小雷,黄钢,等.沙盘游戏联合维思通治疗儿童多发性抽动症的疗效研究[J].中国实用医药,2011,06(19):21-23.

[3]中华医学会精神科分会.CCMD-3中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准.3版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:157-158.

[4]钟佑泉,吴惧,谢晓丽,等.耶鲁抽动症整体严重度量表对抽动障碍患儿的临床评估[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2006,21(3):214-216.

[5]杨倩.探讨常规脑电图与动态脑电图对多发性抽动症脑功能受损的评价[J].医学信息(中旬刊),2010,5(4):816-817.

[6]Carr J E,Chong I M.Habit reversal treatment of tic disorders:a methodological critique of the literature[J].Behavior modification,2005,29(6):858-875.

[7]孙丽苹,唐程艳,徐增杰,等.心理学中沙盘游戏疗法浅析[J].社区医学杂志,2008,6(5):83-85.

[8]刘康香,钟燕,刘筱娴.多发性抽动症儿童的家庭环境因素分析[J].医学临床研究,2008,25(2):211-213.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2015.01.008

中图分类号:R473.74

引用信息:

[1]林秀冰,张婷,李芳.治疗性游戏联合心理干预在儿童多发性抽动症中的应用分析[J].中国妇幼卫生杂志,2015,6(01):25-27.DOI:10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2015.01.008.

发布时间:

2015-01-20

出版时间:

2015-01-20

检 索 高级检索