nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2022, 03, v.13 24-27
心理行为干预对先兆流产患者的临床效果
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2022.03.005
摘要:

目的 探讨心理行为干预在先兆流产患者中的应用效果。方法 选择2019年7月—2020年11月潮州市人民医院收治的先兆流产患者82例,按随机数字表法将患者分为对照组和干预组,每组各41例。对照组实施常规护理,干预组在常规护理的基础上予以心理行为干预。使用量表对比分析两组患者干预前后心理状态、心理压力、社会支持及保胎情况的差异。结果 干预前,两组患者焦虑自评量表(self-rating anxiety scale, SAS)、抑郁自评量表(self-rating depressive scale, SDS)、压力感知量表(pressure perception scale, PSS)、社会支持评定量表(social support rating scale, SSRS)评分相比,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。干预后,干预组SAS、SDS、PSS评分分别为(39.35±6.13)分、(40.38±6.69)分、(14.42±5.17)分,低于对照组的(48.64±6.32)分、(49.63±7.41)分、(19.58±5.43)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预组的SSRS评分(47.95±10.33)分高于对照组的(31.07±8.87)分,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。干预组保胎成功率(92.68%)高于对照组(75.61%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 心理行为干预能够缓解先兆流产患者的负性情绪,降低其心理压力,提高患者社会支持,利于保胎成功。

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of psychological and behavioral intervention on patients with threatened abortion. Methods A total of 82 patients with threatened abortion who were admitted to Chaozhou People's Hospital from July 2019 to November 2020 were recruited. They were divided into two groups(routine care group and intervention group) according to the random number table method, with 41 cases in each group. Kinds of scales were used to compare and analyze the psychological state, psychological pressure, social support and fetal protection pre-and post-intervention between two groups. Results Scores of self-rating anxiety scale(SAS), self-rating depressive scale(SDS), pressure perception scale(PSS), and Social Support Rating Scale(SSRS) between 2 groups were not different significantly before intervention(all P>0.05). After intervention, scores of SAS、SDS、PSS of intervention group were lower than those of the control group,(39.35±6.13) vs.(48.64±6.32),(40.38±6.69) vs.(49.63±7.41), and(14.42±5.17) vs.(19.58±5.43) respectively. But SSRS score of intervention group was higher than that of the control group(47.95±10.33) vs.(31.07±8.87), the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). The rate of miscarriages preservation of the intervention group(92.68%) was higher than that of the control group(75.61%), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Psychological and behavioral intervention can relieve the negative emotions of patients with threatened abortion, reduce their psychological pressure, and improve their social support, which is conducive to the success of miscarriage prevention.

参考文献

[1] 杨玉凤,夏蕾,姚知,等.陪护家属的心理状态对先兆流产住院患者心理的影响[J].河北医药,2016,18(18):2878-2880.

[2] 顾春怡,陆牡丹.渐进性放松训练对先兆流产患者自我效能及妊娠结局的影响[J].中国临床研究,2017,30(4):575-577.

[3] 王柳铮,林飞雅.针对性健康宣教对先兆流产的妊娠结局影响的价值体会[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(12):195-196.

[4] 谢幸,孔北华,段涛.妇产科学[M].9版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:58,70-77.

[5] 俞莹钰,龚志华.认知行为干预对先兆流产急诊患者负性情绪及预后的影响[J].医学临床研究,2020,37(2):317-319.

[6] 李姿慧,吴梦蝶,李琪,等.汉密尔顿焦虑量表和焦虑自评量表在功能性消化不良伴焦虑状态中的应用[J].长春中医药大学学报,2018,34(4):787-790.

[7] 金婷,张磊晶.我国常用的抑郁自评量表介绍及应用[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2017,17(5):366-369.

[8] 陆婷,高钰琳,张近近,等.中文版产后社会支持量表的信效度研究[J].中国实用护理杂志,2014,30(15):26-28.

[9] 李静.126例辅助生殖妊娠后先兆流产患者焦虑、抑郁与社会支持的相关性研究[J].护理学报,2018,25(20):61-63.

[10] 戴小萍,戴海青,廖宝珊,等.中医整体化医疗模式及临床路径在胎动不安(先兆流产)中的应用评价[J].世界中医药,2017,12(5):1175-1178.

[11] 张慧雯,徐桂华.团体干预和音乐放松疗法对体外受精-胚胎移植术后先兆流产孕妇焦虑情绪的影响[J].中国临床研究,2016,29(6):820-823.

[12] 高学军,叶春花,赵会荣,等.延续精准护理对高龄早期先兆流产患者妊娠结局的影响分析[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2017,32(8):947,950.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2022.03.005

中图分类号:R473.71

引用信息:

[1]李毅,余燕学,曾湘玉等.心理行为干预对先兆流产患者的临床效果[J].中国妇幼卫生杂志,2022,13(03):24-27.DOI:10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2022.03.005.

基金信息:

检 索 高级检索