目的 了解云南省边境地区产妇主观幸福感现状，比较不同国籍产妇之间主观幸福感的差别，分析主观幸福感影响因素，为进一步干预提供理论支持。方法 采用自行设计问卷和总体幸福感量表，对居住在云南省边境地区的中国籍和外籍产妇进行问卷调查，了解其社会人口学特征及主观幸福感状况。对边境产妇一般人口学特征进行描述分析，对总体幸福感及各维度得分进行组间比较，用多重线性回归分析边境产妇幸福感的影响因素。结果 本次共调查边境产妇360名，其中，184名外籍（51.10%）,176名中国籍（48.90%）。边境产妇主观幸福感得分（83.54±9.87）分高于全国女性常模（71.00±18.00）分，差异有统计学意义（P <0.05）。外籍产妇主观幸福感得分（84.52±9.35）分略高于中国籍（82.51±10.32）分，但差异无统计学意义（P> 0.05）。越南籍产妇主观幸福感得分（87.30±9.50）分高于缅甸籍（82.18±8.69）分和老挝籍（83.98±9.23）分，缅甸籍和老挝籍差异无统计学意义（P <0.05）。多重线性回归分析结果显示，初中及以上学历的产妇主观幸福感得分较小学及以下的更高（b=-3.57,t=-3.45,P=0.001），做过孕前优生检查的产妇主观幸福感得分较没做过的更高（b=-3.04,t=-2.93,P=0.004），有村干部关心健康状况的产妇主观幸福感得分较没有村干部关心的更高（b=-3.20,t=-2.81,P=0.005）。结论 云南省边境地区产妇主观幸福感较高，外籍与中国籍无差别，越南籍高于缅甸籍及老挝籍。加强社区妇幼保健工作，动员村干部在内的社会成员共同参与，探索适合于边境孕产妇的个性化服务模式，提高对其孕前优生健康检查服务的利用，可促进边境产妇主观幸福感的提升。

Objective To investigate the status quo of subjective well-being(SWB) among pregnant women in Yunnan border areas, compare their differences and analyze the factors associated with SWB, so as to provide theoretical support for further intervention. Methods A self-designed questionnaire and Global Well-being Scale(GWB) were used to investigate the demographic sociological characteristics and SWB among Chinese and foreign pregnant women living in the border areas of Yunnan Province. Their general demographic characteristics were described. Their overall well-being and scores of each dimension were compared between groups, and factors associated with SWB among them were analyzed through multiple linear regression. Results A total of 360 border pregnanct women were recruited, including 184 foreigners(51.10%) and 176 Chinese women(48.90%). The average SWB score of them(83.54 ± 9.87) was higher than that of the national female norm(71.00 ± 18.00)(P < 0.05). The score of foreigners' SWB(84.52± 9.35) was slightly higher than that of Chinese(82.51 ± 10.32), but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). The average SWB score of Vietnamese(87.30 ± 9.50) was higher than that of Burmese(82.18 ± 8.69) and Laos women(83.98 ± 9.23)(P < 0.05), and there was no difference between Burmese and Laos women. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that he scores of maternal SWB of those with junior high school education or above were higher than those of those with primary school education or below(b =-3.57, t =-3.45, P = 0.001), and those with pre-pregnancy eugenetic examination were higher than those without(b =-3.04, t =-2.93, P = 0.004). The scores of maternal SWB with village cadres concerned about their health were higher than those without(b =-3.20, t =-2.81, P = 0.005). Conclusion The border pregnant women have higher level of SWB, and there is no difference between foreigners and Chinese, while Vietnamese have higher level of SWB than Burmese and Laos women. Strengthening community maternal and child health care, mobilizing social members including village officers' participation, exploring individualized service models appropriate for border pregnant women, and improving their utilization of pre-pregnancy health examination services can improve their SWB.